Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lucas

Citations

  • 472 Mass. 387
  • 34 N.E.3d 1242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a requirement for the detrimental reliance element is that the plaintiffs “acted upon [the false representation] to their damage” (citation omitted)
  • holding law violated cognate provision in the Massachusetts Constitution
  • right of free speech is \fundamental\ and protected by art. 16 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights
  • invalidating law under a cognate provision of the Massachusetts Constitution
  • striking down Massachusetts’ law, which was similar to Ohio’s
  • striking down Massachusetts’ law, which was similar to Ohio’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.