Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 8/6/2015
Commonwealth v. Lucas
Citations
- 472 Mass. 387
- 34 N.E.3d 1242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a requirement for the detrimental reliance element is that the plaintiffs “acted upon [the false representation] to their damage” (citation omitted)
- holding law violated cognate provision in the Massachusetts Constitution
- right of free speech is \fundamental\ and protected by art. 16 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights
- invalidating law under a cognate provision of the Massachusetts Constitution
- striking down Massachusetts’ law, which was similar to Ohio’s
- striking down Massachusetts’ law, which was similar to Ohio’s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk, Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSixth Circuit· 2016-02-24· cited 29×
- D.B.S. v. M.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-01-27· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-09-27· cited 13×
- Wendy Rogers v. Hon. mroz/pamela YoungArizona Supreme Court· 2022-02-01· cited 10×
- Magda v. Ohio Elections Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-21· cited 2×
- Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC v. C3WAIN Inc.Third Circuit· 2017-02-03· cited 1×
- In Re DBSCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-01-27
- Susan List v. Steven DriehausSixth Circuit· 2016-02-24
- Johnson v. FreiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-16
- Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Superior Court· 2016-03-09
- Barron v. KolendaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2023-03-07
- Commonwealth v. ArringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2024-02-20
- ANDOVER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD & Another.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2025-09-09
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 1,859×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 1,695×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,446×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 1,319×
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 1,104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.