· 4/21/2016
Commonwealth v. L.P.
Citations
- 137 A.3d 629
- 2016 Pa. Super. 89
- 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- business delivery exclusion invalid because it conflicted with statute requiring coverage for permissive users
- business delivery exclusion invalid because it conflicted with statute requiring coverage for permissive users
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald, Panella, Stabile
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.