Commonwealth v. Loretta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice” standard to review of jury charge when the defendant had not objected below
• There is \more than a soupcon of logic\ in the defendant's argument that \voluntary intoxication is as relevant to a defendant's capacity to form a specific criminal intent as it is to a defendant's capacity to premeditate deliberately\
• There is “more than a soupgon of logic” in the defendant’s argument that “voluntary intoxication is as relevant to a defendant’s capacity to form a specific criminal intent as it is to a defendant’s capacity to premeditate deliberately”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).