Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lobo

Citations

  • 82 Mass. App. Ct. 803
  • 978 N.E.2d 807
  • 2012 Mass. App. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • police officer’s detection of odor of “freshly burnt marijuana” following vehicle stop did not justify exit order in absence of other evidence of criminal activity
  • officer \obtained identification from the defendant and conducted a warrant check that revealed two active criminal warrants\
  • trooper's \immediate observation that none of [a vehicle's] occupants was wearing a seat belt provided a basis to cite . . . all the vehicle's occupants . . . for a seat belt law violation\
  • substantial and prejudicial requirement applied to art. 14 violation
  • substantial and prejudicial requirement applied to art. 14 violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grasso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.