Commonwealth v. L.M., Pet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• eliminating part of injunction enjoining appellants “from violations ‘as charged in the complaint’”
• striking part of antitrust injunction applicable to directors and officers who, though they “may have rendered themselves liable to prosecution,” had not been shown to pose a threat of future violations
• eliminating part of injunction enjoining appellants “from violations ‘as charged in the complaint’”
• discussing differences between “legitimate use and prohibited abuse” of patent rights
• “A patent owner . . has no obligation either to use [the patented invention] or to grant its use to others.”
• “That a patent is property, protected against appropriation both by individuals and government, has long been settled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).