Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the public disclosure bar is no longer jurisdictional and examining the public disclosure issue under Rule 12(b)(6)
• finding that an “amended complaint did not have to be filed under seal, and relator sufficiently complied with the pre-suit requirements of the FCA” where the allegations in the amended complaint were “s ubstantially similar”
• denying dismissal of a federal FCA retaliation claim and then denying dismissal of MFCA retaliation claim “[b]ecause state acts such as the MFCA are construed consistently with the federal FCA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).