Commonwealth v. Lewis, A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a remote, speculative possibility of future injury is insufficient to grant a preliminary injunction
• holding that “the absence of a substantial likelihood of irreparable injury would, standing alone, make preliminary injunctive relief improper”
• holding that a failure to establish irreparable injury “would, standing alone, make preliminary injunctive relief improper”
• holding that plaintiff’s failure to show irreparable injury warranted denial of the motion for preliminary injunction
• holding that violations of the First Amendment constitutes irreparable harm to the Plaintiffs where there is an ““imminent likelihood that pure speech will be chilled or prevented altogether”
• holding that there was no irreparable injury where the harm was “wholly speculative”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).