Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Citations

  • 140 Pa. 561
  • 21 A. 501
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 872

Syllabus

<p>1. The first count of an indictment charged assault and battery; the second, assault and battery with intent to ravish; and the third charged felonious rape, with an averment of the commission of bastardy. In such case, there was no misjoinder of counts.</p> <p>2. Bastardy, while not necessarily involved in rape, may be involved as a resulting incident of fornication, which is included in that offence. It is therefore not error to aver the commission of bastardy in a count charging the commission of rape,</p> <p>3. The word “ only,” in the act of May 19, 1887, P. L. 128, providing that on an indictment for felonious rape the jury may convict “ of fornication only,” is equivalent to “merely,” and under said provision there may be a conviction of fornication and bastardy.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “both adultery and rape include the offense of fornication, it is necessarily involved in them; bastardy is not necessarily involved, but it may be ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Collum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.