Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/2/1993

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Citations

634 A.2d 633
430 Pa. Super. 336
1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

relying on Wolfe and Grier and stating that the appellant’s allegation that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion for reconsideration and modification of sentence was a challenge to the discretionary aspects of his sentence and, therefore, not cognizable under the PCRA
claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to modify sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing and, therefore, not cognizable under the PCRA
claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to modify sentence is a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing and, therefore, not cognizable under the PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Johnson, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.