Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Citations

  • 567 A.2d 1376
  • 523 Pa. 466
  • 1989 Pa. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a failure to preserve an objection to the exclusion of a potential juror for cause results in waiver of the issue, even under the relaxed waiver rule
  • holding that a failure to preserve an objection to the exclusion of a potential juror for cause results in waiver of the issue, even under the relaxed waiver rule
  • noting that \[a]lthough waiver of any claim in a capital case appears to be contradictory to the relaxed waiver rules afforded [death penalty] appellants\ claims may be waived, but still considering the merits of the claim
  • noting that “[although waiver of any claim in a capital case appears to be contradictory to the relaxed waiver rules afforded [death penalty] appellants” claims may be waived, but still considering the merits of the claim
  • “Although waiver of any claim in a capital case appears to be contradictory to the relaxed waiver rules afforded these appellants through Zettlemoyer, the case law of this Commonwealth is clear. This Court has repeatedly held that Witherspoon claims are waivable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.