Commonwealth v. Levine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The - 16 - J-E02006-25 predecessor to Section 9721 was found [by the Pierce Court] to be a clear and unambiguous enactment. The language utilized by the legislature in the predecessor remains unchanged in the current statute.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Klingensmith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-26· cited 27×
• Com. v. Jennings, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-01-14· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Latella v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 76×
• Commonwealth v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-10· cited 53×
• Royal Indemnity Co. v. Adams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-07· cited 32×
• Worley v. Augustine
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-04· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Hunter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-25· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-25· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Mayo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-04· cited 5×