Skip to main content
· 3/11/1991

Commonwealth v. Lenig

Citations

  • 589 A.2d 700
  • 403 Pa. Super. 455
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “where an appellate court has considered and decided a question on appeal, that Court will not, in a subsequent appeal of another phase of the same case, reverse its previous ruling . . ..”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Hudock, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.