Commonwealth v. Lemar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering necessity of specific unanimity instruction where Commonwealth alleged three separate criminal episodes
• \[i]t does not appear likely that the jury verdict would have been different\ had judge, sua sponte, given specific unanimity instruction
• no substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice from absence of specific unanimity instruction where indecent assault and battery charge supported by evidence of three incidents
• court will review jury instruction for “plain error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).