Commonwealth v. Lee's Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the plaintiff alleged “a continuous discharge of hazardous chemicals” and “a continuous violation of [the defendant’s] duty to control and stop it,” the continuing harm doctrine applied and thus the claims were “within the statute of limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).