Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2/10/1992
Commonwealth v. Lee
Citations
- 585 N.E.2d 759
- 32 Mass. App. Ct. 85
- 1992 Mass. App. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where evidence indicates that judge would have denied motion, it is not ineffective assistance if counsel failed to file such motion
- exigent circumstances where drug sale occurred in defendant’s supermarket and surveillance without entry could not prevent money from changing hands quickly inside and evading detection
- exigent circumstances where suspect’s son and others had just been arrested and would likely be able to contact suspect soon
- warrantless entry permitted into basement of supermarket immediately after undercover buy with marked bills had occurred there
- appellate court must decide “whether there is a reasonable likelihood that, if a pretrial motion to suppress had been filed, it would have been allowed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dreben, Fine, Gillerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. TyreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-01-08· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. AdamidesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-09-27· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. BraleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-06-12· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. McAfeeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-05-09· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-09-29· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. PoggiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-01-31· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. DiMarzioMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-10-05· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. VorisMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-04-07· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-07-14· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. NunezMassachusetts Superior Court· 1996-06-15
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 688×
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-01-12· cited 680×
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1970-04-15· cited 617×
- United States v. Paul Gary Rubin United States of America v. Louis Martin Agnes A/K/A Louis MartinThird Circuit· 1973-02-13· cited 286×
- Commonwealth v. FordeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-22· cited 189×
- Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-07-11· cited 141×
- Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-02-10· cited 126×
- United States v. George E. Veillette, Jr.First Circuit· 1985-12-02· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-11-20· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. HuffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-19· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. OlivaresMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-05-16· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. DiSantoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-11-15· cited 31×
- People v. BlasiusMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. CadoretMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-02-10· cited 27×
- Diggs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-12-07· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-06-10· cited 14×
- State v. PeardotCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-05-25· cited 13×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-12-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.