Commonwealth v. Ledford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the difference between FMLA interference and retaliation and dismissing Plaintiff’s FMLA interference claim where Plaintiff failed to allege that she was denied FMLA leave and therefore, any prejudice related to FMLA interference
• precluding expert from testifying about “the causation of 22 plaintiffs’ damages in this case, or the intent of these defendants,” where such subject matters 23 extended “beyond his area of expertise” and “verge[d] on legal conclusions” (emphasis omitted)
• “[B]ecause [the plaintiff] has failed to allege that she was actually denied any FMLA benefits, [she] has failed to allege any prejudice related to FMLA interference.”
• “[T]he question of punitive damages is not properly addressed on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).