Commonwealth v. Learn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in a request for a stay in the context for which Brady provides, the Superior Court would lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition
• in a request for a stay in the context for which Brady provides, the Superior Court would lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition
• remand required in order to afford trial court opportunity to make factual determination on frivolousness.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Orie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-23· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Gains
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-29· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Keenan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-11· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-23· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Berardi
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-21· cited 3×
• Com. v. Gross, E.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bolden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 259×
• Commonwealth v. Brady
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-23· cited 114×
• Municial Publications, Inc. v. Court of Common Pleas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-27· cited 79×
• Commonwealth v. Haefner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-03· cited 79×
• Spatz v. Nascone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-01-16· cited 25×