Commonwealth v. Lawton, M., Pet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “[t]here is nothing in the familiar understanding of the term ‘manifest injustice’ to suggest that it applies only to indigent parties”
• “We review a finding that a case is ‘exceptional’ within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285 for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).