Commonwealth v. Lawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he identity of illegal narcotics may be established by circumstantial evidence alone, without any chemical analysis of the seized contraband.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Baker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-19· cited 309×
• Commonwealth v. Carpio-Santiago
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-24· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-30· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wood
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-03· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Minott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-18· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Edrington
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Stasiak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-08· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-18· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Smithton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-09-29· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Gorodetsky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Logan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-08· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. LESKOVIC
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-06-14· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-03· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Perez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-12· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Carroll
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-03· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Mayes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-14· cited 8×