Commonwealth v. Lawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a PCRA petition asserting claims related to resentencing proceedings was timely when filed within one year of the date that “the new judgment of sentence became final”
• emphasizing that “where a case is remanded to resolve a limited issue, only matters related to the issue on remand may be appealed”
• “[W]here a case is remanded to resolve a limited issue, only matters related to the issue on remand may be appealed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Strunk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-09· cited 107×
• Commonwealth v. Feliciano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-26· cited 10×
• Com. v. Isadore, T.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-06-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dougherty
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-11· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-21· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Hawkins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-19· cited 39×