Commonwealth v. Lapine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• informant overheard conversation between defendant and two men disclosing they committed burglary
• “Gardner's answers to interrogatories more extensively described the incident, alleging that the conflict between Gardner and the employee occurred when Gardner, then allegedly forty-five years old, refused to produce identification proving himself to be of legal drinking age”
• hearing a conversation satisfies the basis of knowledge prong
• basis of knowledge shown when informant heard defendant’s conversation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).