Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lao

Citations

  • 460 Mass. 12
  • 948 N.E.2d 1209
  • 2011 Mass. LEXIS 439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • we have stated on many occasions that judge is not required to instruct on claimed inadequacy of police investigation under Bowden
  • circumstantial evidence in prosecution of murder in first degree was sufficient to warrant jury’s conclusion that defendant killed his estranged wife
  • “the inferences a jury may draw from the evidence ‘need only be reasonable and possible and need not be necessary or inescapable’ ”
  • we have previously determined that protections under art. 12 are \coextensive with the guarantees of the Sixth Amendment\
  • \A conviction may not rest on the piling of inference upon inference or on conjecture and speculation\
  • \a judge is not required to instruct on the claimed inadequacy of a police investigation. ' Bowden simply holds that a judge may not remove the issue from the jury's consideration' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.