Commonwealth v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Obviously, a drug dog sniff search for illegal drugs falls outside the scope of routine traffic law enforcement.”
• “Without evidence that the traffic stop mission was being diligently pursued . . . we cannot say that the sniff search was conducted concurrently with the traffic stop and thus did not prolong the stop . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Christopher Todd Bessinger v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-05-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delaware v. Prouse
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
• United States v. Sharpe
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
• Rodriguez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2015-04-21· cited 2,086×
• Illinois v. Caballes
  Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
• City of Indianapolis v. Edmond
  Supreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
• Cook v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Bucalo
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-03-22· cited 28×
• Gallman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 27×