Commonwealth v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two offenses were not part of the same criminal episode simply because the defendant was arrested for committing robbery and for drug offenses at the same time and because he possessed one of the robbery items at the time of the arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wittenburg
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-03· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Grillo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-06· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Powell
  Adams County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-07-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hude
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 170×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-01-30· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-24· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Walton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-14· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Pinkston
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-17· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Meyers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 6×