Skip to main content
· 6/14/2017

Commonwealth v. Landi, A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that service by email substantially complied with a statute that required service by mail
  • finding substantial compliance when plaintiff emailed rather than mailed the petition to opposing counsel and counsel received the petition
  • “[T]he substantial-compliance doctrine . . . cannot be applied to change the jurisdictional requirement.”
  • “Email . . . is used far more often among attorneys than postal mail and has replaced postal mail as the normal means to transmit legal documents among lawyers in Iowa.”
  • a copy of the petition emailed to opposing counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.