· 6/14/2017
Commonwealth v. Landi, A.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that service by email substantially complied with a statute that required service by mail
- finding substantial compliance when plaintiff emailed rather than mailed the petition to opposing counsel and counsel received the petition
- “[T]he substantial-compliance doctrine . . . cannot be applied to change the jurisdictional requirement.”
- “Email . . . is used far more often among attorneys than postal mail and has replaced postal mail as the normal means to transmit legal documents among lawyers in Iowa.”
- a copy of the petition emailed to opposing counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.