Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lambert

Citations

  • 57 A.3d 645
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 243
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that the exception is not satisfied if the only -5- J-S04039-24 new aspect of the claim is that a new witness has come forward to testify regarding the previously raised claim
  • finding PCRA petition untimely where petitioner offered a new witness to attest to prosecutorial misconduct and petitioner had previously asserted such misconduct
  • relief denied where affidavit alleging perjury only supplied new witness to previously raised claims
  • witness’ affidavit alleging prosecutor’s corruption was not newly-discovered evidence sufficient to qualify appellant for exemption where claims of prosecutorial misconduct had -9- J-S10008-19 been alleged in every appeal and post-conviction petition since conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Olson, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.