Commonwealth v. Lafferty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the effect of the improper statements was prejudicial, it cannot automatically be concluded that they were made with that intent, particularly in light of the strength of the prosecution’s case at the outset.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Simons
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-10· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Byrd
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-04-29· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Feaser
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-06· cited 10×
• Com. v. Byrd, A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-04-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Dinitz
  Supreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
• Commonwealth v. Starks
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 92×
• Commonwealth v. Potter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 83×
• Commonwealth v. Cherry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 70×
• Commonwealth v. Hogan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Warfield
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-14· cited 49×
• United States v. Lloyd Odin Lawson
  Third Circuit· 1964-10-20· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Lafferty
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-21· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Slaughter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-17· cited 2×