Commonwealth v. Ladamus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s contention that the trial court did not adequately consider mitigating circumstances, without more, does not raise a substantial question.
• claim that court failed to adequately consider certain mitigating factors did not raise substantial question
• appellant’s argument that the trial court did not consider his status as the primary caregiver for his mother did not raise a substantial question
• argument that court neither addressed nor considered defendant’s medical condition or his status as primary caregiver for his mother did not raise substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).