Commonwealth v. LaCorte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof of authenticity may take form of testimony \that circumstances exist which imply that the thing is what its proponent represents it to be\
• “it is for the jury to determine — after listening to cross-examination and the closing arguments of counsel — what significance, if any, they will attach to the discovery of the defendant’s fingerprints at the scene of the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).