Commonwealth v. LaBenne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Commonwealth had presented sufficient evidence of DUI where the defendant, inter alia, was seen driving erratically, had bloodshot, glassy eyes, had slow and constricted speech, and failed FSTs
• “[D]istrict attorneys have the sole discretion in moving for admission of a defendant into ARD[.]”
• “[T]he finder of fact[,] while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence.”
• “[T]he finder of fact[,] while passing upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight of the evidence produced, is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).