Commonwealth v. Kwiatkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding G. L. c. 265, § 43 [ d ], unconstitutionally vague under due process principles
• holding G. L. c. 265, § 43 [d], unconstitutionally vague under due process principles
• stalking statute unconstitutionally vague because \repeatedly harassing\ required a \course of conduct\ and this could be interpreted as requiring more than one course of conduct; prospectively interpreted statute to remove \repeatedly\ from the harassment-based offense
• “A pattern or series in the context of [stalking by harassment] would involve more than two incidents”
• pattern of conduct or series of acts, for purposes of harassment violation of stalking statute, must involve more than two incidents
• stalking by harassment requires more than two incidents of harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).