Skip to main content
· 10/16/1981

Commonwealth v. Kujas

Citations

  • 435 A.2d 1293
  • 291 Pa. Super. 411
  • 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that summary offenses charged in the same complaint as misdemeanors are part of a “court case” for the purposes of Criminal Rule 1100
  • concluding that summary offenses charged in the same complaint as misdemeanors are part of a “court case” for the purposes of Rule 1100 (now 600)
  • stating that the Commonwealth is not permitted to use nol pros as a device to change the status of a case and thereby subvert the requirements of Rule 1100

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Wieand, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.