Skip to main content
· 10/25/1985

Commonwealth v. Kozrad

Citations

  • 499 A.2d 1096
  • 346 Pa. Super. 470
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[w]hen crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the [only] one for which a defendant may be sentenced is the most serious, i.e., the crime which carries the greatest maximum penalty”
  • “it is required of this court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte.” (emphasis mine)
  • \it is required of this court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte. \ (emphasis mine)
  • when crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the defendant may only be sentenced for the most serious crime, i.e., the one which carries the greatest maximum penalty
  • when crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the defendant may only be sentenced for the most serious crime, i.e., the one which carries the greatest maximum penalty
  • “It is required of this Court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.