· 10/25/1985
Commonwealth v. Kozrad
Citations
- 499 A.2d 1096
- 346 Pa. Super. 470
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[w]hen crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the [only] one for which a defendant may be sentenced is the most serious, i.e., the crime which carries the greatest maximum penalty”
- “it is required of this court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte.” (emphasis mine)
- \it is required of this court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte. \ (emphasis mine)
- when crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the defendant may only be sentenced for the most serious crime, i.e., the one which carries the greatest maximum penalty
- when crimes merge for sentencing purposes, the defendant may only be sentenced for the most serious crime, i.e., the one which carries the greatest maximum penalty
- “It is required of this Court to correct an illegal sentence sua sponte.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.