Commonwealth v. K.M.-F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing juvenile court’s error in failing to state reasons on the record for out-of-home placement but finding that placement programs outlined by the probation officer provided the necessary information
• court did not abuse discretion when it considered information presented and fashioned a disposition that it believed suited the circumstances best
• court did not abuse discretion when it considered information presented and fashioned a disposition that it believed suited the circumstances best
• “Petitioner additionally challenges placement in Abraxas or Summit Academy. However, his objection does not specifically relate to either placement so much as his belief that probation with conditions is all that is warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of: D.W., Appeal of: D.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-10-01· cited 13×
• In the Interest of: A.R.A., Appeal of: A.R.A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-05-10· cited 3×
• Com. v. K.M.-F.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-05-22
• In the Interest of: N.E.M., Appeal of: N.E.M.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re A.D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-30· cited 51×
• In Re Love
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-26· cited 42×