Commonwealth v. Klueber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard range consecutive sentences are not clearly unreasonable where the trial court relies on the defendant’s prior history and a finding that he was a high risk to re-offend
• holding that standard range consecutive sentences are not clearly unreasonable where the trial court relies on the defendant’s prior history and a finding that he was a high risk to re-offend
• Standard range consecutive sentences are not clearly unreasonable where the trial court relies on the defendant's prior history and a finding that he was a high risk to re-offend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).