Commonwealth v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s statement, “I don’t want to talk no more,” held sufficient
• “I don’t want to talk no more”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rogers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
• Commonwealth v. Rivera
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-29· cited 71×
• Commonwealth v. Peixoto
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-01-25· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Ewing
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-10-06· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Farley
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-07-25· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Santana
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-05-29· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Andujar
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-03-06· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Clarke
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-01-27· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Letkowski
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-09-09· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Halsey
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-08-26· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Chase
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-12-13· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• Commonwealth v. Mahdi
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-04-08· cited 192×
• Rummel v. Peters
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-09-13· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. Burke
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1959-07-03· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Ferreira
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-08-06· cited 71×
• Commonwealth v. Habarek
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-04-06· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Sazama
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1959-05-04· cited 33×