Commonwealth v. Kessler
Citations
- 222 Pa. 32
- 70 A. 941
- 1908 Pa. LEXIS 653
Syllabus
<p>Bridges — County bridges — Maintenance of bridge — Vacation of road on one side of stream.</p> <p>A county cannot be required to erect a bridge over a stream unless the stream crosses a public road or highway.</p> <p>Where under a misapprehension of facts a bridge is erected by a county across a stream within the limits of a city at a point where a public street extends only to the bank of' the stream without any extension thereof on the other side, but thereafter an extension of the street on the other side is opened, the county will be liable after the opening of the extension for the maintenance of the bridge; but if the older or original portion of the street is vacated and closed, so that there is no continuous street across the stream, the liability of the county for the maintenance of the bridge ceases.</p> <p>Mandamus — Right of relator.</p> <p>Mandamus goes out only where there is a clear legal right in the relator and a corresponding duty upon the defendant.</p>
Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Potter, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Underwood v. GendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-01-13· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-12-14· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-02-24· cited 1×
- Monessen-Charleroi BridgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-11-19
- Goldstein v. BossBeaver County Court of Common Pleas· 1931-09-28
- Barker v. Bryn Mawr College TrusteesMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1922-02-20
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.