Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kendall

Citations

  • 451 Mass. 10
  • 883 N.E.2d 269
  • 2008 Mass. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant was not entitled to an instruction on the defense of necessity where he failed to present any evidence that there were no effective legal alternatives to his decision to drive while intoxicated to abate a claimed medical emergency
  • “[A]n instruction on necessity is appropriate where there is evidence that supports at least a reasonable doubt whether operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor was justified by necessity.”
  • necessity defense \exonerates one who commits a crime under the 'pressure of circumstances' if the harm that would have resulted from compliance with the law ... exceeds the harm actually resulting from the defendant's violation of the law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowin, Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.