Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kelley

Citations

  • 664 A.2d 123
  • 444 Pa. Super. 377
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s threats to “kill” the victim demonstrated that the defendant intended to terrorize the victim
  • concluding that the defendant’s threats to “kill” the victim demonstrated that the defendant intended to terrorize the victim
  • holding a threat was communicated when the appellant gave a secretary a message to threaten violence to certain intended recipients
  • explaining that the appellant waived his claim regarding a potential conflict of interest because the issue was “never raised in [his] omnibus pre-trial motion”
  • holding a threat was communicated when the appellant gave a secretary a message to threaten violence to certain intended recipients
  • upholding terroristic threats conviction for threat against a judge where defendant made threat in a conversation with a lawyer’s secretary, fact that defendant threatened to kill the lawyer and the judge “established that he did indeed manifest the intent to terrorize them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Tamilia, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.