Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/30/1992
Commonwealth v. Kauffman
Citations
- 605 A.2d 1243
- 413 Pa. Super. 527
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, with respect to RTKL, that “the fact that the legislature excluded certain documents from public inspection does not mean that the legislature intended to bar the use of such information in judicial proceedings.”
- government is required to turn over subpoenaed documents in state court civil action even if disclosure is not required by RTKL
- “the privilege must be claimed, and a failure to claim the privilege waives it”
- “the privilege must be claimed, and a failure to claim the privilege waives it”
- “In the instant case, the Commonwealth did not assert either a common law governmental/executive privilege or an informer’s privilege. Therefore, they were not considered by the trial court.... The failure to assert a privilege constitutes a waiver thereof.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Cirillo, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-21· cited 216×
- Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-01· cited 99×
- Law Office of Douglas T. Harris v. Philadelphia Waterfront Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-22· cited 27×
- Com. v. Cook, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-07· cited 27×
- Starr v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-04· cited 9×
- Strain v. Simpson HouseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-27· cited 7×
- Mitchell v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-01-28· cited 1×
- Gregury, J. v. Greguras, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-09-20
- Ben v. SchwartzMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-05-16
- Opitz v. BowmanPike County Court of Common Pleas· 1999-07-30
- Toland, C. v. PBPP, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-10-06
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 370×
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1974-12-19· cited 231×
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoE.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-03-13· cited 184×
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court· 1884-02-04· cited 157×
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontD.C. Circuit· 1965-06-09· cited 134×
- Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1872-03-15· cited 82×
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1942, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioSeventh Circuit· 1989-02-28· cited 81×
- Wood v. BreierE.D. Wisconsin· 1972-01-04· cited 76×
- Crawford v. DominicE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-04-26· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 27×
- Lewis v. Roux Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1927-12-28· cited 21×
- Ronnie Holman v. Steve CayceSixth Circuit· 1989-05-02· cited 19×
- Grodjesk v. FaghaniSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-02· cited 19×
- Daniels v. Hadley Memorial HospitalDistrict of Columbia· 1975-09-12· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-08· cited 10×
- Pittsburgh Board of Public Education v. MJNCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-22· cited 7×
- Shultz v. Bd. of S., Jackson Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-11· cited 7×
- Conlon v. DeanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1968-11-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.