Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kauffman

Citations

  • 605 A.2d 1243
  • 413 Pa. Super. 527
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, with respect to RTKL, that “the fact that the legislature excluded certain documents from public inspection does not mean that the legislature intended to bar the use of such information in judicial proceedings.”
  • government is required to turn over subpoenaed documents in state court civil action even if disclosure is not required by RTKL
  • “the privilege must be claimed, and a failure to claim the privilege waives it”
  • “the privilege must be claimed, and a failure to claim the privilege waives it”
  • “In the instant case, the Commonwealth did not assert either a common law governmental/executive privilege or an informer’s privilege. Therefore, they were not considered by the trial court.... The failure to assert a privilege constitutes a waiver thereof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Cirillo, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.