Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Kater

Citations

  • 592 N.E.2d 1328
  • 412 Mass. 800
  • 1992 Mass. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here a witness does not acknowledge a prior extrajudicial identification, such identification cannot be proved by the testimony of a person who observed the identification, and cannot be admitted for its probative value. Commonwealth v. Daye, 393 Mass. 55, 61-62 [1984]”
  • prosecutor may comment on defendant’s appearance at trial
  • “ ‘[W]e agree with those cases which hold that the double jeopardy principle does not automatically bar retrial “where an insufficiency of evidence appeared only when material held on appellate review to have been erroneously admitted was notionally removed from the case” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.