· 7/30/2009
Commonwealth v. Judy
Citations
- 978 A.2d 1015
- 2009 Pa. Super. 148
- 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2265
- 2009 WL 2259975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that in evaluating a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, the relevant question is whether the defendant received a fair trial, not a perfect one
- holding that statements forming the basis for alleged prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed within their greater context
- holding the prosecutor may fairly respond to comments made by defense counsel during closing and may draw fair inferences from the evidence presented
- noting that the trial court has the discretion to grant a mistrial in response to an overly prejudicial event
- observing that a mistrial is an extreme remedy
- denying a challenge for prosecutorial misconduct for bolstering the credibility of the witness to the jury because the contested statements are a “fair response to the defense argument” which degraded the character of the witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowes, Donohue, Freedberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.