Skip to main content
· 7/30/2009

Commonwealth v. Judy

Citations

  • 978 A.2d 1015
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 148
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2265
  • 2009 WL 2259975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that in evaluating a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, the relevant question is whether the defendant received a fair trial, not a perfect one
  • holding that statements forming the basis for alleged prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed within their greater context
  • holding the prosecutor may fairly respond to comments made by defense counsel during closing and may draw fair inferences from the evidence presented
  • noting that the trial court has the discretion to grant a mistrial in response to an overly prejudicial event
  • observing that a mistrial is an extreme remedy
  • denying a challenge for prosecutorial misconduct for bolstering the credibility of the witness to the jury because the contested statements are a “fair response to the defense argument” which degraded the character of the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Donohue, Freedberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.