Commonwealth v. Jones-Bing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a lawyer’s reassertion of judicial bias without any reason to expect a different result was the very definition of an objectively baseless claim
• noting that POME and PRE set forth \nearly identical principles\
• finding Respondent's motivation for once again raising the bias issue in his sixth appeal subjectively improper as a matter of law
• noting that POME and PRE set forth \nearly identical principles\
• addressing de novo whether the lower court properly applied POME
• addressing de novo whether the lower court properly applied POME

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).