Commonwealth v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute should be construed so as to give effect to all its component parts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to America Online, Inc.
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 2000-01-31· cited 17×
• Cowardin v. Burrage
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1953-09-10· cited 2×
• Hickerson Electric Service Corp. v. Drewer Development
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1991-10-03· cited 2×
• Woodward v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-12-28· cited 1×
• City of Richmond v. Imp Pedlar, Ltd.
  Richmond City Circuit Court· 1972-06-14
• M.C. v. S.H.
  Fairfax County Circuit Court· 1999-10-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1951-12-03· cited 31×
• Williams v. City of Richmond
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1941-04-21· cited 30×
• Harris v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1925-06-11· cited 27×
• Rackliff v. Inhabitants of Greenbush
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1899-06-05· cited 16×
• Peters & Reed v. McWilliams
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1884-02-07· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Gregory
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1952-06-16· cited 6×