Commonwealth v. Jolliffe Sr., R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that construing the Act liberally in favor of employees “does not mandate the payment of benefits beyond that authorized by the Act’s provisions and purposes”
• “[T]he hazards encountered by an employee while commuting to work are common to all workers, no matter what their job, and, hence, such risks cannot be directly attributable to a person’s particular employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).