Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/17/1965
Commonwealth v. Johnson
Citations
- 206 Pa. Super. 147
- 211 A.2d 100
- 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 770
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice from consolidation where the trial court instructed the jury on the proper consideration of the consolidated cases and where the defendant did not request additional instructions
- failure to define the crimes of which a defendant stands accused was fundamental error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Flood, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Watkins, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-01-19· cited 104×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Linde v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-01-12· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-03-19· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. NestorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. KrzesniakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-01-17· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. DrewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-09-17· cited 11×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Davis v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-06-17· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. LeitchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-01-21· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-09-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.