Commonwealth v. Jiminez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “nothing intrinsically wrong in counsel for a criminal defendant being retained and compensated by a third party, provided the defendant understands and acquiesces in the arrangement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. Mooney
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-15· cited 130×
• Commonwealth v. Allison
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-07-25· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. DiPietro
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-12-21· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Henriquez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-12-18· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Saferian
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-07-30· cited 1,208×
• Commonwealth v. Hodge
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-05-07· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-06-04· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Shraiar
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-03-06· cited 50×
• Bresnahan v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-07-06· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Perry
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-06-14· cited 17×
• Hugh McCoy Kelley v. State of Alabama
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-02-13· cited 15×
• Victor Calvin Whitaker v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
  Fourth Circuit· 1966-06-20· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Hazen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-17· cited 12×
• Bresnahan v. Patterson
  D. Colorado· 1973-01-08· cited 1×