Skip to main content
· 5/10/2016

Commonwealth v. Jimenez, R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Pennsylvania “precedent requires that an expert opinion be offered to prove the cause of death”
  • holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
  • holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
  • holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause ofydeath were admissible
  • reiterating, that an expert’s independent conclusions based upon inadmissible evidence are admissible
  • after finding Confrontation Clause violation, this Court examines whether error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.