· 5/10/2016
Commonwealth v. Jimenez, R.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Pennsylvania “precedent requires that an expert opinion be offered to prove the cause of death”
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause ofydeath were admissible
- reiterating, that an expert’s independent conclusions based upon inadmissible evidence are admissible
- after finding Confrontation Clause violation, this Court examines whether error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.