· 8/5/1981
Commonwealth v. Jarabek
Citations
- 424 N.E.2d 491
- 384 Mass. 293
- 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the issue in the context of federal and state wiretap statutes
- whether witness’s testimony was independent and not derived from unlawful interception is proper issue for motion to suppress
- whether witness's testimony was independent and not derived from unlawful interception is proper issue for motion to suppress
- elected member of school committee charged with violating sections two and three for soliciting payment to reelection campaign in return for maintaining contract
- scheme between two municipal officials to extort kickback from single contractor did not constitute organized crime
- the exclusionary rule would not extend to live testimony of a participant in an unlawfully recorded conversation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Wilkins, Liacos, Nolan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.