Skip to main content
· 8/5/1981

Commonwealth v. Jarabek

Citations

  • 424 N.E.2d 491
  • 384 Mass. 293
  • 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the issue in the context of federal and state wiretap statutes
  • whether witness’s testimony was independent and not derived from unlawful interception is proper issue for motion to suppress
  • whether witness's testimony was independent and not derived from unlawful interception is proper issue for motion to suppress
  • elected member of school committee charged with violating sections two and three for soliciting payment to reelection campaign in return for maintaining contract
  • scheme between two municipal officials to extort kickback from single contractor did not constitute organized crime
  • the exclusionary rule would not extend to live testimony of a participant in an unlawfully recorded conversation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Wilkins, Liacos, Nolan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.