Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jacobs

Citations

  • 727 A.2d 545
  • 556 Pa. 138
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “it is the trial judge who must interpret the answers and demeanor of all potential jurors to evaluate their ability and willingness to render a fair verdict”
  • considering affidavits attached to appellate brief in attempt to prove layered ineffectiveness
  • “issues [that] were not raised in [an] original PCRA petition, counsel’s amended petition, or the oral amendments made to [a] petition before the PCRA court . . . are waived”
  • “issues [that] were not raised in [an] original PCRA petition, counsel’s amended petition, or the oral amendments made to [a] petition before the PCRA court . . . are waived”
  • any error from prosecutor’s misstatement of evidence was overcome by trial court’s general instruction that arguments of counsel were not evidence and that the jurors were the sole finders of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.